Religious accommodation has been a hot topic in the last few years without much effort to deny it or discern if it’s helpful. Now that we’ve had some time to look back on what these requests accomplished it has become clear that in many cases there was no spiritual benefit to the requestor, nor discernment in the approving authorities.
I am not blameless, not in the least, having helped to push through my fair share of religious accommodations. Most were not from the Judeo-Christian foundation, but some were, and in the last few years, especially the last few months, God has shown me several things from the scriptures that I want to write down for future reference and posterity.
While the
following can apply to any follower of the Bible and the one true God, I am basing
my observations on the Bible, not Jewish tradition or the Talmud or history, so
it may or may not resonate with those who have added to the Hebrew scriptures.
I’ll reference some historical figures here, but they’re to support the
argument, not to act as the foundation. This article is written from a Baptist perspective.
Service Before Self
The first thing I want to say is that most religious
accommodation requests should never have been submitted. I base this on the
principal of laying down our rights for the privilege of serving our fellow
man. Paul surrendered his rights for the blessing of preaching the gospel,
Am I not free? Am I not an apostle?
Have I not seen Jesus our Lord? Are you not my workmanship in the Lord?...Do we
not have the right to eat and drink? Do we not have the right to take along a
believing wife, as do the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and
Cephas? Who serves as a soldier at his own expense? Who plants a vineyard
without eating any of its fruit? Or who tends a flock without getting some of
the milk?...If we have sown spiritual things among you, is it too much if we
reap material things from you? If others have this rightful claim on you, do we
not even more?
Nevertheless, we have not made use
of this right, but we endure anything rather than put an obstacle in the way
of the gospel of Christ…
But I have made no use of any of
these rights, nor am I writing these things to secure any such provision…for
thought I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, that I
might win more of them. ~ 1 Corinthians 9:1,3-5, 7, 11-12, 15 (emphasis mine)
I’d say that’s pretty definitive, but if you’re not convinced
by scripture, try these quotes:
Ask not what your country can do
for you – ask what you can do for your country. ~ John Fitzegerald Kennedy
Let good citizens prefer the public
good to their own private interest... For a citizen who consults only his own
disgusts or profits is a parasite upon the commonwealth. ~ Cicero
No man is worth his salt who is not
ready at all times to risk his well-being, to risk his body, to risk his life,
in a great cause. ~ Theodore Roosevelt
Defending True Religious Accommodation
Sometimes there is a place for a religious accommodation,
and I want to emphasize there is a time to say, “whether it is right in the
sight of God to listen to you rather than to God, you must judge, for we cannot
but speak of what we have seen and heard” (Acts 4:19-20) and “we must obey God
rather than men” (Acts 4:29).
But, most of the requests are optional and are not matters
of spiritual fidelity. If we treat all requests as valid, then we cheapen the
real wrestlings of men like Desmond Doss and Alvin York and other conscientious
objectors who have done wonderful things for the service of the United States
despite their religious accommodation requests. We need men like them so that
if the government asks us to bow before idols or wage unjust wars or pray to
anyone other than the living God, we have legal precedent and past wisdom to
fight for God’s righteousness and his calling in our lives.
Hugh Latimer is famous for preaching an incredibly harsh
message to King Henry VIII and being threatened with his life if he didn’t
recant by the following Sunday. The very next Sunday he preached the same
sermon with renewed fervor. Before preaching he asked himself aloud,
Hugh Latimer, dost thou know before
whom thou art this day to speak? To the high and mighty monarch, the king's
most excellent majesty, who can take away thy life if thou offendest; therefore
take heed that thou speakest not a word that may displease!
But then consider well, Hugh, dost
thou not know from whence thou comest; upon whose message thou art sent? Even
by the great and mighty God! Who is all present! And who beholdeth all thy
ways! And who is able to cast thy soul into hell! Therefore, take care that
thou deliverest thy message faithfully. ~ Hugh Latimer
After the sermon Henry, instead of executing Latimer,
remarked that he wished he had more ministers with such conviction and
integrity towards God.
In this case we whole heartedly should follow the United
States Marine Corps Motto: Semper Fidelis, or Always Faithful. Most of
our religious accommodation requests have been about fidelity to ourselves, not
our God nor to our country. We’ve expended tremendous time and effort for
individuals who were just trying to be served, and this is not right. No wonder
so few were helped by this process, even when it was approved. In trying to
waive or change the laws of the country or organizations for individuals, we’ve
failed to put service before self.
So, reader, learn this lesson well: religious accommodation
is only warranted when those laws or policies directly contradict the will and
commands of God. In this case all individuals are called to choose to serve God
rather than man, even if it costs them dearly. If the law or policy is unjust,
then it should be fought and fixed at the appropriate legislative level, not at
the individual level. Lawmakers and policy makers must consider this before
pushing mass requirements or mandates.
If we are faithful to religious liberty and human
flourishing within organizations (discipline is good for people, despite what
we’ve been led to believe, consider 1 Timothy 4:7-8, 2 Timothy 2:4, Hebrews 12:3-11),
then we’ll see morale improve, a common goal be upheld, and individuals seek
the highest and best usefulness of their teammates.
A person who is convinced that they cannot submit to the orders of those appointed over them while serving God, then they should be helped to transition, within a reasonable timeframe, to a place where they can serve God and their conscience.
Permanently exiting an organization for a spiritual
conviction may sound harsh, but as we learned by kowtowing to every request is
that the organization will soon stand for nothing. Take the military for
example: the emphasis very quickly turned from defending the country to avoiding
lawsuits and bad press. Fading away from long-standing convictions quickly led to forgetting
priorities and allocating manpower to things that didn’t matter and didn’t even
help anyone, even the people requesting the help.
Nazarite Vow
Now, the top of this list is beards. The United States military
has long held to the tradition of a clean-shaven appearance. Right or wrong,
this is the currently codified law of the United States military. Every
military member has raised their right hand and stated that they will obey
orders. But beards were the hot-button topic recently, and certainly will be
again, so I want to consider a few things from a Judeo-Christian worldview on whether
beards are an integral part of the faith.
First though, I want to look at temporary concessions where I think we can work with people for their good and the furtherance of the organizations where they’ll work. Take for example the Nazarite vow. Outlined in Numbers chapter six we see that a Nazarite vow has a lot of requirements. If you don’t want to read the whole list, know that it has dietary, grooming, sanitary, and sacrificial requirements. The Nazarite vow is an opportunity to seek the Lord in a similar way as a Levitical priest:
- Be you a man or a woman from any (or no) tribe (Numbers 6:2)
- Intentionally for the purpose of holiness (Numbers 6:2)
- Abstaining from wine and strong drink (Numbers 6:3)
- Abstaining from vinegar made from wine or spirits (Numbers 6:3)
- Abstaining from all grape products (Numbers 6:3-4)
- But for a predetermined amount of time (Numbers 6:4, though lifelong exceptions occurred elsewhere)
- Without cutting of the hair on the head, neither the beard nor the locks (hair) (Numbers 6:5)
- While avoiding approaching or touching a dead body (Numbers 6:6-7)
- But ready to completely shave your head and making offering of doves if a dead body is touched (Numbers 6:9)
- Expecting to make quite a few offerings, including a ewe lamb, a ram, and bread (Numbers 6:14-17)
- And completely shave your head and burning your hair when complete (Numbers 6:18)
- Along with an OPTIONAL additional contribution (Numbers 6:21)
All this to say, it’s not an easy vow, and while it does
allow for the wearing of a beard, this is not a standalone command. The only optional
pieces of this vow are
- If you’re going to take it
- How long you’re going to observe it
- If you want to include a money offering at the end
Paul upheld the vow and paid the expenses (likely the
mandatory offerings from verses 14-17 and the optional offering from verse 21)
of four Jews in Jerusalem as well as observing his own Nazarite vow in Acts 18:18.
To make it more complicated, we see men like Daniel
observing a sort of vow in Daniel 10:3, similar to a Nazarite vow, but mainly
focusing on avoiding wine and meat (of which the Nazarite vow says nothing) and
anointing, and there is no indication that he shaved his head afterwards.
Daniel’s fast or vow lasted twenty-one days. Mephibosheth also observed a
modified version when he knew David’s life was in danger (2 Samuel 19:24).
So, all of this to say, we should be accommodating people
who want to take vows like this. If it’s in the military where there is some chance
that interacting with a dead body is possible, the members should have a good
plan to end the vow early (v.9). If they’re fasting from meat like Daniel, and
there is a chance they will be in an austere location where vegetarian food is unavailable,
they need to be sure they’ll serve others over endangering them and break their
vegetarian fast early.
If the member is serious about growing a beard, ask them if
they’d be willing to take leave; this could be part of the optional offering.
We don’t want to be legalistic, as Daniel shows us there are other options for
fasting, but we do want to be sincere and ensure our people are sincere. Again,
the ultimate purpose of the Nazarite vow is to serve God, not to impose our
rights or desires on others.
Joseph – The Shaved Ambassador
Do we have an example of someone who was serving God and
people in austere, less than ideal, conditions? Was he required to wear a beard?
Quite the opposite. Joseph spent years (at least two, maybe as many as thirteen,
see Genesis 37:2, 41:1, 41:46) in prison, undoubtedly growing a pretty substantial
beard. When it became apparent to the Pharaoh of Egypt that Joseph could help
him, Joseph was summoned quickly. But he did not go directly to Pharaoh, the
text is clear that he took some time to clean himself up, which included
shaving his beard (Genesis 41:14).
There are many people worthy to be emulated in the Bible,
none more so than Jesus Christ, but Joseph is near the top of that list. If
Joseph took time to make himself presentable in service, and he did, then you’ll
be very hard-pressed to convince me that the wear of a beard is a significant
part of Christianity.
Shame in Shaving
But, you might say, shaving was seen as shameful in 2 Samuel
10 when a band of David’s men are mistreated and half their beards were shaved
off and their clothing was rent in twain. The purpose of David leaving these
men in hiding until their beards grew back was not so that they’d have beards,
it was to let the reminder fade from how they had been shamefully treated on a
diplomatic peace-making trip to supposed allies.
The shaving of half their beards was an outward sign of
someone else’s sin and the inward shame of David’s men; the shaving was not the
point, if it was the Ammonites would have shaved their whole heads. If any of
your members are mistreated by an enemy, learn from this story to seek to restore
them from their shame.
In Christianity, we see this mirrored by the transformation
that turns sinners into saints (consider 1 Corinthians 6:9-11), who used to be
horrible lawbreakers but are now washed, justified, and sanctified.
Jesus’ Beard
You might say, “Jesus had a beard! As a follower of Jesus, I
should imitate him by having a beard! After all, 1 Corinthians 11:1 and 1 John
2:6 and 1 Peter 2:21!”
Have you ever studied how we know that Jesus had a beard? It
is only mentioned in one place in scripture, Isaiah 50:6, where we see it torn
from his face by those who were persecuting him. If Jesus’ beard somehow made
him more holy, pious, or righteous, then we would expect the Bible to make
something of it, rather than show that it was used to increase his obedience (to
allow people to mistreat him) and shame and sorrow. Early Christians like
Polycarp, Irenaeus, and Justin Martyr don’t mention Jesus having a beard at
all, except to quote Isaiah 50:6.
Charles Spurgeon and Clement of Alexandria made arguments
from nature that a beard is natural, scriptural, manly, and beneficial, and I
can agree with them on all of those. But beards are all still optional. Spurgeon
went on to say,
You might put on tomorrow a garment
without seam, woven from the top throughout; you might put sandals on the soles
of your feet; you might wear your beard uncut, and so say, “In all this
I seek to be like Christ,” and you might even ride through the streets of
Jerusalem upon a colt, the foal of a [donkey], but you would be no more like
Christ than you are now. The greatest conformity to his image must be within. (emphasis
mine)
Become an imitator of Christ by coming not to be served, but
to serve (Mark 10:45), and enduring the suffering he endured (Romans 8:17-18, 1
Peter 4:1-3).
Final Thoughts
If a person wants to grow a beard, they are welcome to do it
outside of an organization that requires it.
In other places it was a source of shame (like David’s
servants, and Jesus’ humiliation). Ezra and Ezekiel used their beards to
express mourning and judgement over the sin of the people (Ezra 9:2-6, Ezekiel
5:1-17). If Ezra didn’t have a beard, would he have been able to express his
mourning? If Ezekiel didn’t have a beard, would he have been able to illustrate
God’s judgment? In both cases these were apt illustrations, not requirements.
Conclusion
There is no room for religious accommodation for physical
reasons in Christianity, only in matters dealing with eternity. When it comes to
these accommodations, we’re not waiting for it to get approved on earth, we’re
announcing that it is already approved in heaven.

No comments:
Post a Comment